School Commissioner Mary Adams has been working closely with us on promoting neighborhood schools in the City.  For us in the 19th Ward that has centered primarily on schools 10, 16 and 44.  At present School 44 issues are front and center and will be on the agenda at the April 23 Board meeting.  Currently 44 is being phased out.   At very least we want to see Pre-K through 6th grade stay open at 44 until until School 16 reopens on Post in 2018.  There has been a difference of opinion between the Administration and some member of the School Board on what what agreements with the NY State Education Department and the RCSD are and what can be done at 44.

Today there was a discussion with Ira Schwarts, Assistant Commissioner NY State Education Dept., and Mary Adams just alerted us to the results:

Dear neighbors,  

Ira Schwartz, Assistant Commissioner NY State Education Dept., confirmed the current closure plan for School 44 is not responsive to a NYSED accountability mandate (it is part of the approved FACILITIES modernization plan, for closure no later than 2020-2021). The earliest such an accountability mandate might come is in 2016, based on this current year performance, and it would require action either in Fall '16 or Fall '17. If that mandate were to come - something like what happened with East HS, but it would be under the onerous framework of receivership -- closure of School 44 could be the response (or the superintendent as the "Reciever" could choose to turn it into a charter or identify an EPO to take over, etc.). After the regulations for "Receivership" are written this summer, the superintendent immediately becomes the "Receiver" and has the same powers as future external Receivers would have, ie can unilaterally close a school, turn it into a charter, fire staff, etc. But back to the issue of closure, since that is the approach currently relevant for School 44 -- The usual expected time frame for closure as an accountability response is three years, BUT Dr. Schwartz was clear that there is the possibility of creating a plan that NYSED could accept involving a slightly longer closure time frame if solid rationale and solid improvements for students were articulated (for example, an intentional and well developed transition into the newly renovated School 16 building, involving continued acceptance of new kindergarters at 44 with a plan to transition to 16. He also stated the acceptability of a plan in which the students are physically at School 44 but under the administration of School 16). Again, all of these possibilities could be considered IN THE FUTURE as a response to a possible mandate delivered in 2016 -- we are NOT under this type of mandated action now.

We are however responsible as local school stewards to have an extremely solid plan for continued improvement, and I advocate that is it responsible and wise for us to be ready for the possible constraints and mandates that could be imposed in 2016 if the school is re-labeled as failing based on test scores. This is exactly what the resolution I offer does. (Dr. Schwartz noted the significant gains made at School 44 in 2013-14 according to NYSED measures, though not enough to allow immediate removal from Priority status. In the best of scenarios, School 44 will be in good standing in 2016, but really the plan to develop a coherent eventual merger of neighborhood families into the renovated School 16 building can and should proceed regardless of the school's accountability designation, because it is a reasonable plan.)

Passing the resolution to keep School 44 intact as a K-6 school now would allow us to continue to stay ahead of the "failing school"/ out of time mandates and build a strong neighborhood community school for our families while they continue to have access to seats in the neighborhood. 

These are difficult conditions in which to operate - and there are definitely some important unknowns for the future.  I believe our best shot at successful schools is continuing to strengthen neighborhood schools, and if we are able to achieve stability for 19th Ward and School 44 neighborhood families in the near term, I cannot emphasize enough how important your collective support will continue to be.

Mary

It is important to show support by email or by appearing at the Board Meeting tomorrow April 23rd to support the resolution Mary is presenting.  Mary's Resolution Follows:

Whereas, Rochester City School District leaders have committed to a vision of high quality neighborhood schools such that each child’s family is able to have good choices in his or her neighborhood; and

Whereas, a $1.1 Million bond request for capital improvements at School 44 was made in 2012-13 and subsequent work was completed including new boilers, roof and masonry repairs, as well as expenditures on plumbing, electrical and air monitoring; and

Whereas, the Board has responded to declining student enrollment and budget shortfalls by approving school closures, including Resolution 2013-14:59 for the closure of School 44 by 2020-21; and

Whereas, School 16 on Post Avenue will be renovated during Phase 2 of the Facilities Modernization Plan, expected to re-open in 2018 at the earliest; and

Whereas, District schools in the 19th Ward neighborhood offer far fewer elementary seats than elementary aged children and this lack of stable school entry options is believed to contribute to general dissatisfaction among families and declining enrollment in District schools; and

Whereas, the Draft RCSD Budget for 2015-2016 includes allocations for restoring 2.0 FTE Kindergarten Teachers at School 44; therefore

Be It Resolved, kindergarten will be restored at School 44 for Fall, 2015; and be it further

Resolved, The Rochester Pre-K Parent Program will operate three full day pre-kindergarten classes at School 44; and be it further

Resolved, School 44 will serve students in grades pre-K through 6 until School 16 re-opens on Post Avenue; and be it further

Resolved, the Superintendent and Deputy Superintendent for Administration will coordinate with the Office of Student Placement, School 44 leaders and others to inform 19th Ward families about neighborhood school options and prepare in advance for the smooth articulation of School 44 and School 16 children moving into the renovated Post Avenue building following renovations; and be it further

Resolved, the Superintendent, Deputy Superintendent for Teaching and Learning, and other relevant staff work to address the “Priority” status of School 44 in a way that advances the spirit and features of neighborhood community schools among the School 44 community and the returning School 16 community; and be it further

Resolved, approaches which may involve merging staff and resources from School 16 prior to the return of School 16 to Post Avenue will require approval by the School Based Planning Teams at both School 16 and School 44 and would not occur until later than June 30, 2016, if they occur at all.

Views: 184

Replies to This Discussion

I think every effort should be made to reopen School 16 before 2018.  There is no reason any changes cannot be made within one year to bring the school building up to shape.  If Midtown Tower can be rebuilt in a year, so can School 16.

I want to thank the School Board for approving Mary Adam's resolution for keeping School 44 open until School 16 is reopened in 2018.  I also want to thank everyone who called or emailed the School Board urging the approval of this important resolution.

It is very important for us to next address our need for a revised school busing policy that encourages the use of neighborhood schools by providing busing for any student who chooses their their home school if they live more than 1/4 mile from that school.  Details of this need are discussed in my March 8th post urging a Push to revamp the busing regulations.  This link also also provides contact information for NY State officials who should be called or emailed urging busing regulation changes.

I think all students should be able to walk to their schools.  Do away with all buses.   That would save lots of dollars.  I do not understand why students cannot walk.  That's how it was when I was a student, going to neighborhood schools.  Even in kindergarten and first grade.  Maybe if kids walked they would not be so obese, a health problem as I understand.  The number of school buses on this street amazes me, some dropping off only one student.  Followed by three others!

Does this make any sense?

It would be great if most kids walked Mark. It would be good for their health and and save money.  I walked 3/4 miles to school 1st through 6th grade in the central Massachusetts town I grew up in. There were no sidewalks for half the route.  The winters were very cold and snowy and we got a good workout getting to and from school.  The biggest fear that parents had for their kids then was the possibility of their child being hit by a car.  There was no concern about children being exposed to drug dealers or of their getting shot or stabbed.   I suspect that was pretty much the case here also in the 50's and 60's. 

Today in Rochester however, we have to recognize the reality and perceptions that parents face.  This perception has been shaped by the 50 year busing history and the open enrollment option that students have had.  The information explosion that the internet and news media provide today spreads the bad news and fears much more than it does good new.  The loss of well paying manufacturing jobs and the increase of single parent families ensure that stay-at-home parents are rare.  Even if the local school is excellent, choosing a school more than 1.5 miles away allows the parent to put their child safely on a bus before they rush off to work.  In the afternoon the child is dropped off at their door.  The more time the child is on the bus, the less time they are home alone.

If the district suddenly stopped the busing, besides the uproar from parents, there are also state or federal regulations to deal with.  Students enrolled in a school across town deserve the right to stay in the school they started in if they want.  The best we can hope for is to morph the current long distance busing situation to a predominantly short distance busing option.  Short distance busing then lets more local parents more easily get to their child's school events and get more familiar with their neighborhood.  Some bused local kids will get to know walkers from their area and eventually will want to walk with them.  We can hope this local busing option will eventually change the student enrollment in regular local schools from perhaps ~20% local walkers and ~80% long distance bus riders to  ~20% local walkers, ~50% short distance bus riders and ~30% long distance bus riders. Local busing will reduce the number of buses you see going down the street but they will be stopping more often.

The fact that many families move around in the City during the time their children attend a school means there will always be a need to accommodate 1.5mile or more bus riders since children often want to stay in the school they start in.  Open enrollment should continue because it offers alternative programs, such as expeditionary learning, and also there will be cases where parents don't want their child attending school in their neighborhood for valid reasons. 

Ideally, all city schools would offer quality education.  There would be no need for any of this.  I am not opposed to local busing but it makes more sense to have children walk.  I am no expert, though.  You have devoted much time to this issue.  Thanks, John.

RSS

SW Merchants

Information Links

These links plus others can also be found under the Links tab.

ABOUT THE 19TH WARD

19th Ward Community Association
Rochester City Living
RocWiki.org

 

ANIMAL RELATED SERVICES

To report animal cruelty, call 911 or  THE ANIMAL CRUELTY HOTLINE: (585) 223-6500

City of Rochester Low-income Spay/Neuter for pet Dogs and Cats

Rochester Community Animal Clinic - low-income spay/neuter for pet dogs and cats, and feral cats

PAWS, Inc.Providing Animal Welfare Services

City of Rochester Adopt a Dog or Cat

Lollypop Farm, The Humane Society of Rochester and Monroe County 

 

BUYING A HOME IN THE 19TH WARD

Homesteadnet.com

City of Rochester Property Information

Rochester City Living

Trulia Listed Homes For Sale

UR Home Ownership Program

Zillow listed homes for sale

COMMUNITY LINKS

Arnett Public Library

Brooks Landing

City of Rochester 

John Lightfoot, Monroe County Legislator,District 25

Loretta Scott, City Council President, At Large

LaShay D. Harris, South District

Genesee Valley Park

Metro Justice

RGRTA Bus Information

Minority Reporter

SouthWest Tribune

Rochester Green Living

ROCSPOT

Sector 4 Comm. Developmant Corp

Savor Life Radio Show

Teen Empowerment

WDKX Urban contemporary 103.9 FM

WRUR 88.5 UR and WXXI partnership  88.5 FM

Southwest Family YMCA

UR Gov. & Community Relations


EDUCATION

Rochester Prep Charter School

U.S. Dept. of Education

 

FAITH COMMUNITY

St. Monica Church


BUSINESSES

El Latino Restaurant
D and L Groceries
Hand Crafted Wrought Iron
Jim Dalberth Sports
Menezes Pizza
TOPS Friendly Markets
Staybridge Suites

OUTREACH AND SERVICES

Coalition to Prevent Lead Poisoning (CPLP)

Dealing with Lead
Drug Activity
Healthy Blocks
HEAP NY Home Heating Assistant
Home Safety Tips    LifeTimesAdultDay Health Care
Medicare
NeighborWorks Rochester
Parking / Abandoned Vehicles
2-1-1 Social Services
ACT Rochester

OTHER

Genesee Co-op FCU

3/50 Project

South Wedge Ning

© 2024   Created by John Boutet.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service